basecamp/kamal on Hacker News

…pay for a docker registry. [0] https://kamal-deploy.org/docs/configuration/docker-registry/... [1] https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/blob/eee0083b38661c3707c6b...

comment by ndr · 2026-06-25 · in A Practical Guide to SSH Tunnels: Local and Remote Port Forwarding

I think it'd be a perfect fit. We'll see what happens: https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/issues/1588

comment by christiangenco · 2025-06-19 · in Show HN: Unregistry – “docker push” directly to servers without a registry

…on its own. There’s some more explanation on why they decided to switch away from Traefik: https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/pull/940

comment by dewey · 2024-09-22 · in Kamal Proxy – A minimal HTTP proxy for zero-downtime deployments

…version. There are some context about why they switched and decided to roll their own, from the PR. https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/pull/940

comment by yla92 · 2024-09-21 · in Kamal Proxy – A minimal HTTP proxy for zero-downtime deployments

Also exciting that Kamal 2 (currently RC https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/releases ) will support auto-SSL and make it easy to run multiple apps on one server with Kamal.

comment by shafyy · 2024-09-21 · in Kamal Proxy – A minimal HTTP proxy for zero-downtime deployments

…a side project. Seems to be similar in spirit. Has anybody used it, and if so, what do you think? https://github.com/basecamp/kamal

comment by Nelkins · 2024-09-13 · in Does your startup need complex cloud infrastructure?

I love the minimal approach - will try it! There is also: https://kamal-deploy.org/ https://github.com/basecamp/kamal https://dokku.com/ https://github.com/dokku/dokku/ https://clace.io/ https://github.com/claceio/clace

comment by reneberlin · 2024-06-10 · in Piku: Allows git push deployments to your own servers

For homelab, Docker compose should be enough For something more production oriented https://github.com/basecamp/kamal

comment by morbicer · 2024-03-03 · in The hater's guide to Kubernetes

well, at least they had the courtesy of using "-f" in their curl-to-sh https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/blob/v1.0.0/lib/kamal/comm...

comment by mdaniel · 2023-09-19 · in Kamal: Yet another way to deploy your web apps (from the maker of Ruby on Rails)

Honestly these days I am leaning towards this approach: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/ It's all just docker.

comment by sho · 2023-07-21 · in Fly.io Postgres cluster down for 3 days, no word from them about it

…it could even be running SQLite, and query via a web UI. Doesn't seem to exist for this scale. [1] https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk [2] https://k3s.io/ [3] https://dokku.com/

comment by ricardobeat · 2023-06-11 · in The curse of scalable technology

…you can provide the cmd in the mrsk config. You can see this in the jobs role in the example: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#using-different-roles-for-ser... .

comment by mr_ndrsn · 2023-03-23 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io

> When you look at the issues: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/issues/44 Wow. That’s uh, that’s certainly a decision. > They're the same service, because they're running the same image If something purports to “run my containers” and “be an…

comment by FridgeSeal · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io

…of the app. Prune unused images and stopped containers to ensure servers don't fill up. --- 1. https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#readme

comment by jahsome · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io

something to note DHH is a beast. MSRK seems most of MSRK was written by him alone - https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/commits/main?after=83dc82661b... his output is crazy. that's why he gets the big bucks

comment by dzonga · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io

…so build our own looks really bad from an engineering perspective. When you look at the issues: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/issues/44 you can some see trivial shortcoming that has been solved for years by other solutions.

comment by Thaxll · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io

…37Signals is using it at scale yet, so you may get a better idea by looking at the docs yourself. https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk

comment by bdcravens · 2023-03-22 · in De-cloud and de-k8s – bringing our apps back home

…to hold requests while the new application container is started and the old one is stopped.” https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk I’m looking forward testing this out. I already use Traefik and back in the day I used to use Capistrano to deploy…

comment by Uninen · 2023-03-01 · in MRSK – Deploy Apps Anywhere

This is mrsk: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk It is described as "Capistrano for containers" (This is DHH/37signals so we are in the ruby world) Mrsk is written in ruby and it is hard to type because autocorrect will change it to the name…

comment by xrayarx · 2023-02-28 · in I am pretty sure it's gonna carry the same spirit as Ruby / Rails (MRSK)

Repo on Github: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk

comment by onnnon · 2023-02-28 · in Introducing MRSK - 37signals way to deploy

…for next steps, such as deploy/management? And if you’ve seen it, what do you you think of https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk ?

comment by sho · 2023-02-26 · in Awesome Docker Compose Examples

Interestingly, it looks like DHH is working on something similar (for Rails): https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk > MRSK deploys web apps in containers to servers running Docker with zero downtime. It uses the dynamic reverse-proxy Traefik to…

comment by shafyy · 2023-02-08 · in Show HN: Docker rollout – Zero Downtime Deployment for Docker-compose

…and also this project he's working on, this will make things a lot nicer and more polished: https://github.com/rails/mrsk

comment by dewey · 2023-01-26 · in Rails on Docker