Hacker GitHub

← All repos

basecamp/kamal

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 14,701 Ruby

Deploy web apps anywhere.

37 mentions on Hacker News by 30 people: 14 stories, 23 comments · first 2023-01-11 · latest 2026-06-25

Mentions per year 37 mentions · busiest year 2023 (22)
20082026
  1. …pay for a docker registry. [0] https://kamal-deploy.org/docs/configuration/docker-registry/... [1] https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/blob/eee0083b38661c3707c6b...
  2. ▲ 3
    Kamal v2.12.0
    story by tosh · 2026-06-18 · 0 comments
  3. ▲ 3
    Kamal
    story by sakopov · 2026-04-17 · 0 comments
  4. I think it'd be a perfect fit. We'll see what happens: https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/issues/1588
  5. ▲ 2
    Kamal v2.3.0
    story by tosh · 2024-11-01 · 0 comments
  6. ▲ 2
    Kamal: Automated deployment system for self-hosting web apps
    story by saikatsg · 2024-10-14 · 0 comments
  7. ▲ 2
    Kamal v2.2.0
    story by tosh · 2024-10-09 · 0 comments
  8. ▲ 2
    Kamal 2.0.0
    story by tosh · 2024-09-26 · 0 comments
  9. …on its own. There’s some more explanation on why they decided to switch away from Traefik: https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/pull/940
  10. …version. There are some context about why they switched and decided to roll their own, from the PR. https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/pull/940
  11. Also exciting that Kamal 2 (currently RC https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/releases ) will support auto-SSL and make it easy to run multiple apps on one server with Kamal.
  12. …a side project. Seems to be similar in spirit. Has anybody used it, and if so, what do you think? https://github.com/basecamp/kamal
  13. ▲ 15
    Kamal: Reason behind choosing Docker instead micro VMs (like firecracker)
    story by tosh · 2024-09-03 · 6 comments
  14. I love the minimal approach - will try it! There is also: https://kamal-deploy.org/ https://github.com/basecamp/kamal https://dokku.com/ https://github.com/dokku/dokku/ https://clace.io/ https://github.com/claceio/clace
  15. For homelab, Docker compose should be enough For something more production oriented https://github.com/basecamp/kamal
    comment by morbicer · 2024-03-03 · in The hater's guide to Kubernetes
  16. well, at least they had the courtesy of using "-f" in their curl-to-sh https://github.com/basecamp/kamal/blob/v1.0.0/lib/kamal/comm...
  17. ▲ 4
    Kamal 1.0: Deploy web apps anywhere
    story by ksec · 2023-09-19 · 0 comments
  18. ▲ 1
    Thanks for breaking my deployment Maersk
    story by obiefernandez · 2023-08-22 · 0 comments
  19. ▲ 6
    MRSK is renamed to Kamal due to a trademark claim
    story by jrnkntl · 2023-08-22 · 1 comment
  20. Honestly these days I am leaning towards this approach: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/ It's all just docker.
  21. …it could even be running SQLite, and query via a web UI. Doesn't seem to exist for this scale. [1] https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk [2] https://k3s.io/ [3] https://dokku.com/
    comment by ricardobeat · 2023-06-11 · in The curse of scalable technology
  22. …you can provide the cmd in the mrsk config. You can see this in the jobs role in the example: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#using-different-roles-for-ser... .
    comment by mr_ndrsn · 2023-03-23 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io
  23. > When you look at the issues: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/issues/44 Wow. That’s uh, that’s certainly a decision. > They're the same service, because they're running the same image If something purports to “run my containers” and “be an…
    comment by FridgeSeal · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io
  24. …of the app. Prune unused images and stopped containers to ensure servers don't fill up. --- 1. https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#readme
    comment by jahsome · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io
  25. something to note DHH is a beast. MSRK seems most of MSRK was written by him alone - https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/commits/main?after=83dc82661b... his output is crazy. that's why he gets the big bucks
    comment by dzonga · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io
  26. …so build our own looks really bad from an engineering perspective. When you look at the issues: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk/issues/44 you can some see trivial shortcoming that has been solved for years by other solutions.
    comment by Thaxll · 2023-03-22 · in MRSK vs. Fly.io
  27. …37Signals is using it at scale yet, so you may get a better idea by looking at the docs yourself. https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk
  28. …to hold requests while the new application container is started and the old one is stopped.” https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk I’m looking forward testing this out. I already use Traefik and back in the day I used to use Capistrano to deploy…
    comment by Uninen · 2023-03-01 · in MRSK – Deploy Apps Anywhere
  29. This is mrsk: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk It is described as "Capistrano for containers" (This is DHH/37signals so we are in the ruby world) Mrsk is written in ruby and it is hard to type because autocorrect will change it to the name…
  30. Repo on Github: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk
  31. …for next steps, such as deploy/management? And if you’ve seen it, what do you you think of https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk ?
    comment by sho · 2023-02-26 · in Awesome Docker Compose Examples
  32. ▲ 57
    Zero-downtime deployment tool for web apps (created by DHH, creator of Rails)
    story by jay-barronville · 2023-02-18 · 12 comments
  33. ▲ 3
    Deploy Web Apps Anywhere
    story by ujeezy · 2023-02-15 · 0 comments
  34. Interestingly, it looks like DHH is working on something similar (for Rails): https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk > MRSK deploys web apps in containers to servers running Docker with zero downtime. It uses the dynamic reverse-proxy Traefik to…
  35. …and also this project he's working on, this will make things a lot nicer and more polished: https://github.com/rails/mrsk
    comment by dewey · 2023-01-26 · in Rails on Docker
  36. ▲ 2
    Deploy Rails apps in containers to servers running Docker with zero downtime
    story by Ocha · 2023-01-15 · 0 comments
  37. ▲ 12
    Rails MRSK – Deploy Rails app with zero downtime to any host
    story by Alifatisk · 2023-01-11 · 4 comments