yyx990803/vite-vs-next-turbo-hmr
View on GitHub ↗ ★ 928 JavaScript
Benchmarking Vite vs. Next + turbopack HMR performance
6 mentions on Hacker News by 6 people: 2 stories, 4 comments · first 2022-10-28 · latest 2026-03-13
20082026
-
…hosting Next outside of Vercel requires a special adapter [5]. Choosing Next.js is a liability. 0 - https://github.com/yyx990803/vite-vs-next-turbo-hmr/discussi... 1 - https://nextjs.org/blog/our-journey-with-caching 2 -…
comment by gherkinnn · 2026-03-13 · in Vite 8.0 Is Out -
…based). I made the exact same point two years ago when Turbopack came up with a similar benchmark: https://github.com/yyx990803/vite-vs-next-turbo-hmr/discussi... The point is if we want to compare bundler performance, we should keep all…
comment by EvanYou · 2024-06-25 · in Farm: Fast vite compatible build tool written in Rust -
…when the original numbers were close to 6x. I guess they 'typo-ed' Vite's numbers as well. https://github.com/yyx990803/vite-vs-next-turbo-hmr/discussi...
comment by ZephyrBlu · 2022-11-01 · in Turbopack Performance Benchmarks -
Another benchmark by maintainer of Vue and Vite, Evan You: https://github.com/yyx990803/vite-vs-next-turbo-hmr He seems to imply that Turbopack is very close in performance to existing tooling like Vite in his benchmark, and not 10x better…
comment by colinchartier · 2022-11-01 · in Turbopack Performance Benchmarks