Hacker GitHub

← All repos

w3c/html

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 2,060 HTML archived

Deliverables of the HTML Working Group until October 2018

12 mentions on Hacker News by 11 people: 5 stories, 7 comments · first 2012-09-05 · latest 2026-01-24

Mentions per year 12 mentions · busiest year 2017 (5)
20082026
  1. …m/validator/validator/wiki/Markup-%C2%BB-Vo... https://www.matsimon.dev/blog/to-close-or-not-to-close https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/737 There's more.
    comment by assimpleaspossi · 2026-01-24 · in XHTML Club
  2. …the most basic documents. [1]: http://archive.xmlprague.cz/2017/files/xmlprague-2017-procee... [2]: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/1116 [3]: https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/6e305c457e42276bf275b8... [4]: Edit: this affects…
  3. …the recommendations than in the drafts, so there's no point in using the recommendations. Ouch [1]: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/754
    comment by tannhaeuser · 2017-10-09 · in W3C HTML 5.1 2nd Edition
  4. …are countless W3C specs that don't have errata kept up-to-date, and, hell, the 5.1 errata is just < https://github.com/w3c/html/issues> (if they fix a bug in 5.2 drafts, will they keep the issue open so it continues to appear on that…
    comment by gsnedders · 2016-11-17 · in HTML 5.1 is the gold standard
  5. …bug tracker. https://github.com/whatwg/html/pulse might give a reasonable overview. Compare to https://github.com/w3c/html/pulse . Some relevant corroborating links: - https://annevankesteren.nl/2016/01/film-at-11 when this all started -…
    comment by domenicd · 2016-11-01 · in HTML 5.1 is a W3C Recommendation
  6. …instead of presumably more semantically appropriate `<del>..</del><ins>..</ins>` [1]. [0] https://github.com/w3c/html/blob/master/diff/html5to51diff.h... [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/REC-html51-20161101/edits.html#el...
    comment by myfonj · 2016-11-01 · in HTML 5.1 is a W3C Recommendation
  7. I believe this is what he's talking about: https://github.com/w3c/html
    comment by specifictso · 2016-01-22 · in W3C forks HTML yet again