Hacker GitHub

← All repos

usbarmory/tamago

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 2,113 Go

TamaGo - bare metal Go

23 mentions on Hacker News by 17 people: 6 stories, 17 comments · first 2019-10-24 · latest 2026-06-16

Mentions per year 23 mentions · busiest year 2025 (6)
20082026
  1. …projects like Tamago [0] that let you run your golang application without even needing an OS [0] https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago
    comment by bizzletk · 2026-06-16 · in Boot Naked Linux
  2. Im curious, have you considered using tamago instead of tinygo? https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago
  3. …Armory also created TamaGo, instead of using Rust, exactly for the same reasons, to prove a point. https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago https://reversec.com/usb-armory/ Because in IT, seeing is believing.
  4. ▲ 3
    TamaGo: Bare Metal Go
    story by nateb2022 · 2025-12-17 · 0 comments
  5. …(or noos (No-OS)). https://github.com/golang/go/issues/73608 Sounds like they want to maybe include https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago in the compiler.
  6. …class of systems and is not something that can be upstream being a different compiler, see https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Qu...
    comment by lcarsip · 2025-05-08 · in Proposal: Add bare metal support to Go
  7. Looks like Tamago targets multiple VM runtimes https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago?tab=readme-ov-file
    comment by jasonthorsness · 2025-05-07 · in Proposal: Add bare metal support to Go
  8. …https://www.withsecure.com/en/solutions/innovative-security-... https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago
    comment by pjmlp · 2025-03-28 · in Golang on the Playstation 2
  9. …microcontroller support [5] [1] https://github.com/mit-pdos/biscuit [2] https://gvisor.dev/ [3] https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago [4] https://tinygo.org/ [5] https://tinygo.org/docs/reference/microcontrollers/
  10. See TamaGo, https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago Or TinyGo, https://tinygo.org/docs/reference/microcontrollers/
    comment by pjmlp · 2023-12-19 · in Gokrazy – Go Appliances
  11. …maintaining a well-documented and super clean code base. [1]: https://github.com/google/gvisor [2]: https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago [3]: https://gvisor.dev/blog/2023/04/28/systrap-release
    comment by lima · 2023-05-21 · in OS in Go? Why Not
  12. …products written in bare metal Go. https://www.withsecure.com/en/solutions/innovative-security-... https://github.com/usbarmory/tamago
    comment by pjmlp · 2022-09-24 · in Rust 2024 the Year of Everywhere?
  13. If you want to go deeper, there is also bare-metal Go runtime for rpi (among others): https://github.com/f-secure-foundry/tamago
  14. …rather than enabling Go to be used for full-fledged generic operating system implementations. [1] https://github.com/f-secure-foundry/tamago/wiki/Internals
  15. ▲ 1
    TamaGo – bare metal Go for ARM SoCs
    story by anthropodie · 2022-01-21 · 0 comments
  16. Isn't Tamago (that hit the front page few days ago) exactly that sort of bare-metal Go https://github.com/f-secure-foundry/tamago
  17. …only support ARM. I'm sure there are more differences. Edit: They answer the question in their faq https://github.com/f-secure-foundry/tamago/wiki/Frequently-A...
    comment by ejolto · 2020-09-24 · in TamaGo – bare metal Go for ARM SoCs
  18. ▲ 184
    TamaGo – bare metal Go for ARM SoCs
    story by dgellow · 2020-09-24 · 28 comments
  19. Depends, while I am not big fan of Go, not everyone thinks that way, https://github.com/f-secure-foundry/tamago https://labs.f-secure.com/blog/tamago/ https://www.f-secure.com/en/consulting/foundry
  20. …Similar effort for the PI, https://gokrazy.org/ F-Secure Go's bare metal implementation, https://github.com/f-secure-foundry/tamago For OCaml, there is https://ocaml.github.io/ocamlunix/ . And then all the utilities that come out from…
  21. ▲ 1
    TamaGo – Bare Metal Go for ARM SoCs
    story by nnx · 2019-12-30 · 0 comments
  22. ▲ 3
    TamaGo – Bare Metal Go for ARM SoCs
    story by x3ro · 2019-12-28 · 2 comments
  23. ▲ 3
    TamaGo: Bare Metal Go for ARM SoCs
    story by ingve · 2019-10-24 · 0 comments