Hacker GitHub

← All repos

tc39/proposals

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 19,202

Tracking ECMAScript Proposals

46 mentions on Hacker News by 39 people: 6 stories, 40 comments · first 2016-05-16 · latest 2025-08-03

Mentions per year 46 mentions · busiest year 2017 (12)
20082026
  1. …I read their release notes and become aware of these things. Sometimes I also read the proposals, https://github.com/tc39/proposals I really want the pipeline operator to be included.
    comment by moralestapia · 2025-08-03 · in Modern Node.js Patterns
  2. …Proposals tend to get adopted at a snail's place but it's neat to see what's coming down the pike: https://github.com/tc39/proposals
    comment by stank345 · 2025-03-20 · in The Frontend Treadmill
  3. Once you understand the fundamentals, knowing about the newer stuff would be a good step forwards: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/main/finished-proposa...
  4. …better or at least more adopted languages also target) - Javascript's spec. is not time invariant ( https://github.com/tc39/proposals#readme ) - Typescript isn't the best solution (There are better less adopted solutions providing types,…
    comment by hussainbilal · 2023-01-13 · in Ask HN: Is TypeScript worth it?
  5. …but - for example - TC39 uses GitHub https://github.com/tc39/ (here are the proposals for JS https://github.com/tc39/proposals ), whatWG also uses GH https://github.com/whatwg/html
  6. …of ECMAScript can be found at the end of this table (everything with "2022" in the last column): https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/main/finished-proposa... The ECMAScript 2022 specification can be found here (warning: large…
    comment by FrontAid · 2022-06-22 · in ECMAScript 2022 approved
  7. ▲ 4
    Decorators reach ECMAScript Stage 3
    story by jacobr · 2022-03-28 · 1 comment
  8. …s.google.com/web/updates/2018/03/smooshgate [2] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-built-in-modules [3] https://github.com/tc39/proposals
  9. …and callback-based APIs will always consist of an [error, data] tuple for the arguments [3]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals [4]: Because Oracle owns the trademark, of course: http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=75026..…
  10. …list of finished proposals that have been merged into the standard and implemented in browsers - https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/ecma402/finish... I may or may not be involved in majority of them! :)
    comment by zbraniecki · 2021-06-02 · in Intl
  11. …and maintainers of open source little libraries. If you'd like to see what we're working on, see https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/ecma402/README... If you'd like to join us, please check out…
    comment by zbraniecki · 2021-06-02 · in Intl
  12. …of TypeScript. This is nothing new, it has been discussed since ES4 times 10+ years ago. [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/stage-1-propos...
    comment by pier25 · 2020-09-30 · in The Failed Promise of Web Components
  13. …about last year as a kind of push based replacement for Subjects in RxJS/Observable land. [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/stage-1-propos... [2]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-iterator-helpers [3]:…
  14. …Presumably they were deemed safe to add to TS now that they have reached Stage 3 as JS proposals. https://github.com/tc39/proposals
    comment by svachalek · 2019-11-06 · in TypeScript 3.7
  15. Stage 1 proposals were moved to a separate page, presumably to reduce clutter https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/stage-1-propos...
    comment by lhorie · 2019-09-26 · in New ES2019 JavaScript features
  16. Yea, I was thinking the same, it's not even on https://github.com/tc39/proposals
    comment by SSchick · 2019-09-26 · in New ES2019 JavaScript features
  17. https://tc39.es/proposal-observable/ It's (still) on Stage 1: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/stage-1-propos...
    comment by pier25 · 2019-06-30 · in The Cost of JavaScript in 2019
  18. …proposal was discussed. [0] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jPsw7EGsS6BW59_BDRu9... [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/stage-0-propos... [2] https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/b8da60318b564f13...
    comment by thomasfoster96 · 2018-11-12 · in BigInt: Arbitrary precision integers in JavaScript
  19. …I love it in languages like F# and Elixir, but it looks like the pipe proposal is still stage 1. https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/README.md
  20. ▲ 1
    A page to track ECMAScript proposals
    story by fagnerbrack · 2018-07-20 · 0 comments
  21. ▲ 1
    Tc39/proposals: Tracking ECMAScript Proposals
    story by rbanffy · 2018-07-02 · 0 comments
  22. …the language, and there is a pipeline of more proposals[2]. [1]: http://es6-features.org/ [2]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals
  23. …standardization at best. WHATWG handles Fetch and their spec[1] was updated seven days ago. [0] https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/README.md [1] https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org
    comment by thomasfoster96 · 2018-03-23 · in D3.js 5.0 is out
  24. ▲ 1
    Promise.prototype.finally is now stage 4
    story by skellertor · 2018-02-14 · 0 comments
  25. …is not aware there is a stage 3 proposal [1] for 64 bit integers right now called BigInt [2]. [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals [2]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-bigint
    comment by johnsonjo · 2018-02-03 · in ECMAScript 2018: final feature set
  26. …proposals and the different stages they're in. Why would WASM mean slowing down JS changes? [0] https://github.com/tc39/proposals
    comment by TheAceOfHearts · 2018-02-03 · in ECMAScript 2018: final feature set
  27. I couldn’t immediately see any proposals for list/set/object comprehensions at https://github.com/tc39/proposals , are there any?
    comment by Myrmornis · 2018-02-03 · in ECMAScript 2018: final feature set
  28. That'd be awesome. Submit a proposal! https://github.com/tc39/proposals
  29. According to [the repo]( https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/finished-propo... ) only one minor feature had reached stage 4 since last year. Not sure why this is on top HN.
    comment by growtofill · 2017-11-07 · in ECMAScript 2018 Language Specification
  30. …in the next version of the standard)? [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-finally [2]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/README.md [3]: https://tc39.github.io/process-document/
    comment by runarberg · 2017-10-23 · in Promise.prototype.finally
  31. NB this is still a Stage 1 proposal: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/README.md Still a ways away from being "a thing" in the language spec.
  32. …compared to the massive changes ES2015 (aka "ES6") introduced. Check the full list of them here: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/finished-propo...
    comment by Andrex · 2017-07-11 · in ECMAScript 2017 Language Specification
  33. Here’s what’s in it: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/finished-propo... And some interesting tweets by Kent C. Dodds: https://twitter.com/kentcdodds/status/880121426824630273 Edit: fixed KCD's name. Edit #2: No, really.
  34. …via Babel and/or polyfills for ~18 months or so, so they’ve been used for a while now. [0] https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/finished-propo...
    comment by thomasfoster96 · 2017-07-11 · in ECMAScript 2017 Language Specification
  35. The "finished" proposals have a good list: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/blob/master/finished-propo...
    comment by samerbuna · 2017-07-11 · in ECMAScript 2017 Language Specification
  36. …Stage 3, and is already implemented in Chrome/V8. For reference on proposal status and details, see https://github.com/tc39/proposals .
    comment by acemarke · 2017-06-23 · in Why Choose Vue.js
  37. …by this, it's just my impression from reading the discussion on various WHATWG specs.) [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals [2]: https://tc39.github.io/process-document [3]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals/issues/44
  38. …and `require.import(specifier)` – seems pretty confusing, but maybe I'm getting it all wrong? [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposals
    comment by mstade · 2017-02-22 · in ECMAScript 2016+ in Firefox
  39. …ecosystem to use. I think it will be fine. [0] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-ptc-syntax [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposals
    comment by thomasfoster96 · 2017-01-30 · in ECMAScript 2017: the final feature set
  40. Note that object spreading is neither an ES6 nor an ES7 feature. It is currently at stage 2 - https://github.com/tc39/proposals#active-proposals "Rest/Spread Properties"
  41. ▲ 1
    GitHub – Tc39/proposals: Tracking ECMAScript Proposals
    story by q-_-p · 2016-08-15 · 0 comments
  42. ▲ 2
    JavaScript Async/Await proposal has finished and expected in ES2017
    story by albertstill · 2016-08-03 · 0 comments
  43. …to make it into the official spec [1][2]. [0] http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/7.0/ [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposals [2] http://www.2ality.com/2016/02/ecmascript-2017.html
  44. …2 features this year, and decorators are only a stage 1 proposal, so not likely next year either. https://github.com/tc39/proposals
    comment by RobertKerans · 2016-06-17 · in ECMAScript 2016 Approved
  45. TC39 is still working on it, it's in stage 3. https://github.com/tc39/proposals
  46. You're right: https://github.com/tc39/proposals#active-proposals It certainly takes its time :) Well, Bublé sound cool for projects where feature stability over time is critical (like huge codebases), but I will still prefer to go with…