tc39/proposal-json-superset
View on GitHub ↗ ★ 123 archived
Proposal to make all JSON text valid ECMA-262
6 mentions on Hacker News by 6 people: 0 stories, 6 comments · first 2018-02-03 · latest 2023-04-23
20082026
-
…I like the name.... ;-D So all JSON is valid (modern) JavaScript. [1] Is RON valid Rust? [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-superset
comment by ronyeh · 2023-04-23 · in Ron: Rusty Object Notation -
The article leads with an incorrect statement. JSON is now a subset of JavaScript: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-superset
comment by spankalee · 2019-12-28 · in Unintuitive JSON Parsing -
JSON is a syntactic subset of Javascript in ES2019 [1]. https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-superset
comment by ZephyrP · 2019-09-18 · in The cost of parsing JSON -
That bit of incompatibility will be going away when this proposal is implemented, however: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-superset
comment by empyrical · 2019-02-21 · in Simdjson – Parsing Gigabytes of JSON per Second -
…goal of JSON was to be "a subset of JavaScript", but it's actually not. Actually, it's really close https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-superset This is a stage 3 proposal likely to make it to the next version of the spec. At which point…
comment by inglor · 2018-04-22 · in Parsing JSON is a Minefield -
…that can't be represented in ES object literals. There's a proposal in Stage 3 to fix that though: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-json-superset
comment by epmatsw · 2018-02-03 · in ECMAScript 2018: final feature set