Hacker GitHub

← All repos

tc39/proposal-flatMap

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 213 HTML archived

proposal for flatten and flatMap on arrays

11 mentions on Hacker News by 10 people: 2 stories, 9 comments · first 2018-03-07 · latest 2022-10-10

Mentions per year 11 mentions · busiest year 2018 (7)
20082026
  1. For context, it's worth pointing out the PR and some of the actual reactions: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/pull/56 https://twitter.com/bterlson/status/971210573818904576 https://twitter.com/BenLesh/status/971462667322839040…
    comment by spankalee · 2022-10-10 · in SmooshGate (2021)
  2. …being discussed and it was suggested that it be called 'smoosh' to avoid breaking MooTools apps(!) https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/pull/56
  3. …Array#concat for a shallow flatten. Shallow by default would also align with flatMap too." [0] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/issues/9
    comment by kevlened · 2019-07-31 · in What’s New in ES2019
  4. …Array#concat for a shallow flatten. Shallow by default would also align with flatMap too." [0] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/issues/9
    comment by kevlened · 2019-07-31 · in What’s New in ES2019
  5. …affair first broke. There was a long, passionate, but civilised debate about it on GitHub ( https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/pull/56 ) which was abruptly cut off by a TC39 committee member, who locked out non-contributors entirely,…
  6. The PR in question: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/pull/56
  7. …is quite set in stone. [1] https://github.com/tc39 [2] https://tc39.github.io/proposal-flatMap/ [3] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/pull/56
    comment by WorldMaker · 2018-03-09 · in Don't let TC39 use smoosh or smooshMap
  8. …body for ECMAScript, which JavaScript implements. smoosh was a proposed alternative name (see: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/pull/56 ) for flatten (and smooshMap for flatMap) due to incompatibilities with older libraries…
    comment by retrocat · 2018-03-09 · in Don't let TC39 use smoosh or smooshMap
  9. Context: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-flatMap/pull/56 This entire thing is just dumb. I would actually double down and _let_ them name it smoosh because they will surely make some non-FP friendly design choice in semantics anyways.