squaresapp/rawjs-sample
View on GitHub ↗ ★ 45 TypeScript
Sample project to demonstrate the simplicity of RawJS projects.
6 mentions on Hacker News by 6 people: 0 stories, 6 comments · first 2024-01-03 · latest 2024-01-06
20082026
-
…a higher level, not get rid of almost all of the abstractions entirely like rawJS. Have a look at https://github.com/squaresapp/rawjs-sample/blob/35939695dba6... . This is the kind of code that is meaningless to my app. It's just DOM…
comment by vasyop · 2024-01-06 · in RawJS is a better way to call document.createElement() -
…still reading to look at any other file in the example project and draw their own conclusions: https://github.com/squaresapp/rawjs-sample
comment by chuckadams · 2024-01-03 · in RawJS is a better way to call document.createElement() -
RawJS library author here. There's a demo app here: https://github.com/squaresapp/rawjs-sample (Does that help you? Or do you think it still needs more?) I'll get on updating the readme shortly.
comment by Py_ · 2024-01-03 · in RawJS is a better way to call document.createElement() -
…complexity. > - TypeScript builds your app in milliseconds, even if your app gets huge. [1] https://github.com/squaresapp/rawjs-sample
comment by jakelazaroff · 2024-01-03 · in RawJS is a better way to call document.createElement() -
Even worse, their "Check out Squares" link takes me to https://github.com/squaresapp/rawjs-sample The live sample of that is not very impressive. And even worse: > These are the limitations you need to accept with this project structure: >…
comment by pcthrowaway · 2024-01-03 · in RawJS is a better way to call document.createElement() -
I appreciate that there is a code sample at https://github.com/squaresapp/rawjs-sample , but I'd prefer something more explicit. Like what https://youmightnotneedjquery.com did - comparisons between the popular library and the replacement.
comment by merelysounds · 2024-01-03 · in RawJS is a better way to call document.createElement()