Hacker GitHub

← All repos

samccone/The-cost-of-transpiling-es2015-in-2016

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 1,323 JavaScript

Investigating the overhead cost of compiled es2015

9 mentions on Hacker News by 8 people: 3 stories, 6 comments · first 2016-02-02 · latest 2017-12-30

Mentions per year 9 mentions · busiest year 2016 (8)
20082026
AllStoriesComments NewestTopOldest
  1. ▲ 2
    Investigating the overhead cost of compiled es2015 (2016)
    story by ryannevius · 2017-12-30 · 0 comments
  2. Are you referring to https://github.com/samccone/The-cost-of-transpiling-es2015-i... ? These benchmarks are about the cost of transpilation (where ES6 support is not native).
    comment by tilt · 2016-04-25 · in Node.js ES2015/ES6 support
  3. Ironically the same person who first reported this npm vulnerability used the wrong package name uglifyjs instead of uglify-js in an unrelated github project. https://github.com/mishoo/UglifyJS2/issues/936#issuecomment-...…
    comment by u223344 · 2016-03-26 · in Vulnerability #319816 – npm fails to restrict the actions of malicious packages
  4. Maybe this should link to the upstream? https://github.com/samccone/The-cost-of-transpiling-es2015-i...
    comment by wldcordeiro · 2016-02-08 · in The cost of transpiling ES2015 in 2016
  5. ▲ 177
    The cost of transpiling ES2015 in 2016
    story by AlexMuir · 2016-02-08 · 133 comments
  6. The Closure example failed to pass the compiler flags to minify the code, so the numbers are wrong. At a first glance, the Closure output is about half the size of the numbers published there. https://github.com/samccone/The-cost-of-transpi…
    comment by evmar · 2016-02-03 · in Investigating the overhead cost of compiled ES2015
  7. Hi, member of the TypeScript team here. A big reason for the file size increase seems to be the inclusion of an AMD module loader and AMD prologues themselves. By targeting CommonJS and using Browserify, you see a nice decrease. I've sent…
    comment by DanRosenwasser · 2016-02-03 · in Investigating the overhead cost of compiled ES2015
  8. I was just going to comment that it would be interesting to see the size of a run-through with browserify+uglifyify+uglify but looks like there is already a PR for it. https://github.com/samccone/The-cost-of-transpiling-es2015-i...
    comment by kasbah · 2016-02-02 · in Investigating the overhead cost of compiled ES2015
  9. ▲ 83
    Investigating the overhead cost of compiled ES2015
    story by tilt · 2016-02-02 · 13 comments