Hacker GitHub

← All repos

propublica/compas-analysis

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 701 Jupyter Notebook

Data and analysis for 'Machine Bias'

6 mentions on Hacker News by 2 people: 0 stories, 6 comments · first 2016-05-23 · latest 2016-06-29

Mentions per year 6 mentions · busiest year 2016 (6)
20082026
  1. It's the same underlying analysis. Their github repo contains the same script I linked to: https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis/blob/master/Co... It even contains the same weasel words…
  2. In block [37] of the ipython notebook, are racial main effects missing? I only see interactions. https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis/blob/master/Co...
    comment by thisisdave · 2016-05-23 · in Machine Bias
  3. …to hide an agenda behind verbiage and anecdotes. Go read the author's actual statistical analysis: https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis/blob/master/Co... In the statistical analysis (unlike the verbiage) she is completely unable…
    comment by yummyfajitas · 2016-05-23 · in Machine Bias
  4. Go read the description of the statistical analysis or just view their R notebook: https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis/blob/master/Co... Their own analysis shows that (p ~= 0) that high and medium risk factors are predictive.…
    comment by yummyfajitas · 2016-05-23 · in Machine Bias
  5. …For example, the author of this very article has done such an analysis. Here's her R notebook: https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis/blob/master/Co... Her analysis shows (within the limitations of the frequentist paradigm) that: a)…
    comment by yummyfajitas · 2016-05-23 · in Machine Bias
  6. …analysis doesn't support conclusion, write down a bunch of anecdotes. Really, here's her R script: https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis/blob/master/Co... Just read that. It's vastly better than this nonsensical article.
    comment by yummyfajitas · 2016-05-23 · in Machine Bias