planetscale/discussion
View on GitHub ↗ ★ 79
7 mentions on Hacker News by 1 person: 0 stories, 7 comments · first 2024-02-05 · latest 2024-07-14
20082026
-
…ranges or a central server allocating chunks are two popular methods that come to mind. [0]: https://github.com/planetscale/discussion/discussions/366
comment by sgarland · 2024-07-14 · in ULID: Like UUID but Sortable (2019) -
…it can be done at scale), UUIDv7 is probably the best from a DB performance perspective. [0]: https://github.com/planetscale/discussion/discussions/366
comment by sgarland · 2024-06-12 · in How to get the most out of Postgres memory settings -
…at scale. As for auto-incrementing, there are plenty of solutions for distributed systems. [0]: https://github.com/planetscale/discussion/discussions/366
comment by sgarland · 2024-06-05 · in You'll regret using natural keys -
…Don’t cause B+tree page splits, especially in an RDBMS with a clustering index like MySQL. [0]: https://github.com/planetscale/discussion/discussions/366
comment by sgarland · 2024-04-11 · in The UX of UUIDs -
…periodically refreshed. PlanetScale uses int PKs [0], and they seem to have scaled just fine. [0]: https://github.com/planetscale/discussion/discussions/366
comment by sgarland · 2024-02-10 · in Almost every infrastructure decision I endorse or regret