libressl/openbsd
View on GitHub ↗ ★ 246 C
Source code pulled from OpenBSD for LibreSSL - this includes most of the library and supporting code. The place to contribute to this code is via the OpenBSD CVS tree. Please mail patches to tech@openbsd.org, instead of submitting pull requests, since this tree is often rebased.
13 mentions on Hacker News by 13 people: 0 stories, 13 comments · first 2014-07-16 · latest 2021-03-25
20082026
-
This is the fix for the LibreSSL issue [1]: https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/5f00b800... This is the fix for the OpenSSL issue: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/02b1636fe3db274497... They don't appear to be…
comment by TimWolla · 2021-03-25 · in OpenSSL Security Advisory -
…through the libressl project complaining about the lack of safe way to get good random data[1] [1] https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/blob/4e9048830a...
comment by masklinn · 2019-09-17 · in Linux Kernel 5.3 -
2.2.7 came out in May 2016. The switch to 2048 bits was in May 2014. * https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/30eb68d7...
comment by JdeBP · 2019-05-29 · in The sorry state of OpenSSL usability (2017) -
Here's the referenced commit for the interested: https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/ddd98f8e... To be honest I'm kinda surprised that even after the 'goto fail' story people still write code in this questionable style(I…
comment by erdeszt · 2017-05-05 · in TLS verification vulnerability in LibreSSL 2.5.1-2.5.3 -
…increasing major browser/OS support. 1. https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/114 2. https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/issues/58
comment by xoa · 2016-10-12 · in Alpine Edge has switched to libressl -
…beta feature during LibreSSL 2.5.x and released as stable in 2.6. If you have time, take a look at https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd And email patches to: tech@openbsd.org Edited: tls_load_file instead of tls_read
comment by montyedwards · 2016-10-12 · in Alpine Edge has switched to libressl -
…to have happened in LibreSSL since the initial rage-sprint. Where did you get that impression? https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commits/master shows an actively developed project
comment by parfe · 2016-09-22 · in OpenSSL Security Advisory -
…it? Got your answer? Good. Now see the comments in LibreSSL for why your answer to that is wrong: https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/blob/cb62fd8b9b... > But calling /dev/urandom unreliable is a little bit intellectually…
comment by neerdowell · 2016-04-13 · in An Analysis of OpenSSL's Random Number Generator -
…safer) systems for their CSPRNG. https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl.git/+/refs/head... https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/blob/master/src...
comment by Titanous · 2016-04-13 · in An Analysis of OpenSSL's Random Number Generator -
LibreSSL sync: https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/7cd43a39...
comment by jgrahamc · 2015-03-19 · in OpenSSL Security Advisory -
…how to find the true repository, as it is stored in CVS). This is closer, and a bit busier: https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd
comment by CJefferson · 2015-03-12 · in OpenSSL Audit -
The changes introduced are potentially extremely damaging. Take for example: https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/search?utf8=%E2...
comment by xnull6guest · 2015-03-10 · in Invented by OpenBSD -
Looks like they fixed it: https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/commit/32d9eee... https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/c5188a3a... And there's a new tarball out: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=140548206911600&w=2
comment by edwintorok · 2014-07-16 · in LibreSSL's PRNG is Unsafe on Linux