Hacker GitHub

← All repos

bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 456 C

This is the master copy of the BitKeeper source

19 mentions on Hacker News by 18 people: 3 stories, 16 comments · first 2016-05-10 · latest 2025-11-24

Mentions per year 19 mentions · busiest year 2020 (7)
20082026
  1. …document to show that the words in Git has indeed to do with a master-slave relationship: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H... But as I said elsewhere, I do not care about that a lot. However, I do think those…
  2. …Git, used the terminology "master" and "slaves", so the association is not based on nothing: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/0524ffb3f6f1...
    comment by optionalsquid · 2025-11-24 · in Git 3.0 will use main as the default branch
  3. …Git's concept of a master branch was borrowed from BitKeeper which used master/slave terminology. https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H...
  4. …on stage BitKeeper itself is open source now and (an old version) of the protocol is documented at https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/p... .
    comment by ob · 2024-07-05 · in A Git story: Not so fun this time
  5. And in light of the history, https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper is funny on several levels.
    comment by yjftsjthsd-h · 2024-07-04 · in A Git story: Not so fun this time
  6. …detect data corruption and recover data from some types of corruption. https://www.bitkeeper.org/ https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/src/l... https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/994fb651a404...
  7. …That isn't true - master in git comes from master in BitKeeper which did have slave replicas. https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H... Not that there is anything wrong with slave in this context.
  8. …control? If you meant to say "based on how git works..." then sure, that's a more accurate claim. https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H...
  9. Doesn't it come from Bitkeeper? See https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H... for master/slave terminology.
    comment by bretthopper · 2020-06-15 · in GitHub renaming default branch to “main”
  10. …Git was made to replace bitkeeper which had (has?) the concepts of master/slave repositories: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H... https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/... Edit: to those…
  11. Nope, it's mentioned right here: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H...
  12. …used and the one that inspired git. Bitkeeper used a master/slave architecture that git dropped. https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H...
  13. Apparently git did inherit master from bitkeeper which had master and slave (replica) repositories. https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H...
  14. …plantation". Evidently, this is a relic from bitkeeper which uses the "master/slave" terminology. https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H... https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/...
  15. …is technically the second changeset, it seems, but I posted this one since the first is just blank: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/commit/a082174a1b...
    comment by captn3m0 · 2016-05-10 · in First BitKeeper commit
  16. There is an official mirror on GitHub: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper