Hacker GitHub

← All repos

WebAssembly/interface-types

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 643 WebAssembly archived

49 mentions on Hacker News by 36 people: 1 story, 48 comments · first 2017-11-14 · latest 2026-03-11

Mentions per year 49 mentions · busiest year 2018 (12)
20082026
  1. …or pure NIH. Yet I still cannot help but lament the lost time.) Better late than never I guess. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/commit/f8ba0d... [2] https://wingolog.org/archives/2023/10/19/requiem-for-a-strin... [3]…
  2. …standards committee, so not very likely I think 6) Something like the Interface Types proposal ( https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/main/pro... ) becomes a thing allowing wasm programs to be consisted of modules written in…
    comment by DanielHB · 2024-02-06 · in WebAssembly Playground
  3. …https://github.com/WebAssembly/reference-types/blob/master/p... - interface types (inactive): https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/main/pro... - component model: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model If this looks…
  4. …has dissolved into "component-types", but this scope-creep definitely is already quite concerning: https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types
    comment by flohofwoe · 2023-08-18 · in TypeScript is surprisingly ok for compilers
  5. Interface types appear to continue to be making progress: https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types
    comment by bluejekyll · 2022-06-20 · in The State of WebAssembly 2022
  6. …know if there’s a better intro article. I believe this is the current iteration of the proposal: https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/main/pro...
    comment by bluejekyll · 2022-04-20 · in WebAssembly 2.0 First Working Draft
  7. …early days. And there's a link to the proposal here, for people like me who don't know about it: https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types
    comment by richdougherty · 2022-04-19 · in WebAssembly 2.0 First Working Draft
  8. …able to have DOM support. There's currently a proposal for that, but it's not yet in the core spec. https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/main/pro...
    comment by Deukhoofd · 2022-04-01 · in Spin – WebAssembly Framework
  9. The Interface Types Proposal is Wasm's answer to what you're describing: https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/main/pro...
    comment by krona · 2022-02-01 · in Pay attention to WebAssembly
  10. …a very prominent (and hopefully the preferred) way to deploy a lot of applications, eventually. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/main/pro...
    comment by the_duke · 2022-01-21 · in WebAssembly: The New Kubernetes?
  11. …(16 days, 0 comments) [4] https://github.com/extensibleweb/manifesto [5] https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/main/pro...
    comment by rektide · 2021-12-26 · in VSCode terminal from DOM to <canvas>
  12. …expect to see an explosion of projects in this vein once interface types are a real thing. [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p...
    comment by mbStavola · 2021-09-18 · in WAGI: WebAssembly Gateway Interface
  13. For reference, this is the lead maintainer of AS. You previously posted yourself that documenting sanitisation at the component boundary would be an acceptable solution: ( https://web.archive.org/web/20210726140105if_/https://github... ).…
    comment by conrad-watt · 2021-07-26 · in An Urgent Notice from AssemblyScript
  14. This seems to be the discussion thread related to this. https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/issues/13
    comment by AndrewDucker · 2021-07-25 · in An Urgent Notice from AssemblyScript
  15. …it forward. If you want to chime in and retrieve more context, here are some relevant issues: * https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/issues/135 * https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/issues/136 *…
    comment by syrusakbary · 2021-07-25 · in An Urgent Notice from AssemblyScript
  16. …interface types[0], which allow both accessing complex (JS) objects and calling browser APIs. [0] https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p...
  17. …Proposals: https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals Roadmap: https://webassembly.org/roadmap/ [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p... Edit: Overall, the proposals seem to be pushing WASM closer to being a…
  18. …WebAssembly loading (for more than 4KB at least) and Interface Types to remove any Javascript ( https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p... ) will also improve the actual and perceived performance significantly. The…
  19. …get really interesting what the potential performance looks like for DOM-interaction heavy apps. https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p... I wouldn't think it's far behind. The Multi-Value proposal, which had huge…
    comment by gavinray · 2020-08-11 · in Single Page Applications using Rust
  20. …change the situation. The primary one that I'm aware of is the interface types proposal [1]. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p...
  21. The interface types proposal will allow to call DOM APIs from WebAssembly directly [ https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p... ] The point of doing it is of course performance.
  22. …implemented but I was surprised that this use case didn't work as well as I thought it would. [0] https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p...
  23. …extension [0], but no host supports it yet AFAIK. Also still a very tricky problem. [0] https://github.com/webassembly/interface-types
    comment by Jasper_ · 2019-12-16 · in WebAssembly becomes a W3C Recommendation
  24. …features like more native control over the DOM without going through JS interfaces (see here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/interface-types/blob/master/p... for more technical details). Even if client-side UI frameworks don't pan out for…
  25. …resources clock in at [RAM: 6MB, CPU: 1.3% Storage: 10MB], which is completely reasonable. [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/webidl-bindings/blob/master/p... [2]: https://github.com/zserge/webview [3]:…
  26. …[2] to WebAssembly cover this? [1] - https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals/issues/16 [2] - https://github.com/WebAssembly/webidl-bindings/blob/master/p...
  27. …brings me to https://duckduckgo.com/?q=host+bindings+extension+to+WASM&ia... . The first result is https://github.com/WebAssembly/webidl-bindings/blob/master/p... , a 404. If you want someone to find something so badly, link it instead of…
  28. …far as DOM work you would have to dive into the DOM string portion of JS API integration section: https://github.com/WebAssembly/webidl-bindings/blob/master/p... If you are confused as to what the article says then submit a pull request…
  29. …details for the spec update you are talking about have already been addressed in these comments: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro... You should read my previous comment if you want any further replies.
    comment by austincheney · 2019-02-27 · in Universal Binaries Using WASM
  30. What you're missing is https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
    comment by steveklabnik · 2019-02-26 · in Universal Binaries Using WASM
  31. It's coming: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
  32. It's coming: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
    comment by markdog12 · 2019-01-28 · in Compile Ruby into WebAssembly
  33. …some other little things. Some resources to check out if you want to learn more: * Host bindings: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro... * More info about web-sys (web-sys is like the raw libc for the web):…
    comment by mnemonik · 2018-10-23 · in Multithreading Rust and Wasm
  34. …in WASM terms (which is harder due to lack of structural, array, string, null, etc types)? 0 - https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
    comment by kodablah · 2018-10-22 · in WebAssembly’s post-MVP future
  35. …getter or setter. These remaining built-ins will be addressed with the host-bindings proposal.` -- https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings (BTW I could be mistaken, just quoting the article)
  36. …to find out you can't do DOM manipulation as that was my use case. From my brief research https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings is the repository to watch for progress.
    comment by rudedogg · 2018-08-07 · in V8 release v6.9
  37. …message of WebAssembly since forever has been augment, not replace. You can find the proposal here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
    comment by steveklabnik · 2018-06-21 · in V8 release v6.8
  38. I believe that'd be a follow-up to the host bindings proposal [1]. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
    comment by grayrest · 2018-04-18 · in Hello wasm-pack
  39. …the web. Maybe once that happens you'll start seeing your node servers stop falling over. 1: e.g. https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings (Host Bindings Proposal for WebAssembly: This repository is a clone of…
    comment by benjaminjackman · 2018-03-16 · in Run JavaScript on Cloudflare with Workers
  40. …has seen a good bit of activity recently. 0 - https://github.com/WebAssembly/reference-types 1 - https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings
  41. …an object in WASM/host-bindings will require a spill to function, with no chance of specialization: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/issues/11#issue... If you think the assembly in this article is bad, WASM/host-bindings appear…
  42. It is not tied together with GC support; that used to be the case, but https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/ is the way forward.
    comment by steveklabnik · 2018-02-16 · in WebAssembly First Public Working Drafts
  43. …is to be used like we use a GPU : crazy fast, but expensive calls and memory to/from JS [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
    comment by netgusto · 2018-01-20 · in WebAssembly and Rust: performance analysis
  44. …direct DOM access was decoupled from GC. This is expected to move much more quickly. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/blob/master/pro...
  45. I don't know where it is on the current roadmap, but there's some activity here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/
  46. https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/
  47. https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/
  48. …edit: Scratch all of that above. I stand corrected. Here's the DOM proposal: https://github.com/WebAssembly/host-bindings/