Hacker GitHub

← All repos

MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 601 Python

Verify Precision of all Kimi K2 API Vendor

8 mentions on Hacker News by 8 people: 0 stories, 8 comments · first 2025-10-12 · latest 2026-06-17

Mentions per year 8 mentions · busiest year 2026 (5)
20082026
  1. Kimi K2 had a vendor verifier: https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier (there's a table which shows comparison between vendors) Also, it seems there's a general one as well (for all kimi models?):…
  2. …record I started doing this approach because the Kimi team released this which was shocking to me: https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier
  3. > [Groq] rounded out the bottom of Kimi's verification program Ok, this is interesting: https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier/ > Did you do any research yourself? How, systematically speaking? I would need a properly structured…
    comment by mdp2021 · 2026-06-03 · in How is Groq raising more money?
  4. It's old, Kimi's been doing this for months now. https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-Vendor-Verifier Note, this is before K2.5 and K2.6 even launched.
  5. Very impressive, would love to see the results from the verifier for this fully local setup: https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier
  6. …from moonshotai for K2 where they compare their official implementation to third party providers. https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier It's one of the lowest rated on that table.
  7. This is most likely issue on the side of the inference provider: https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier For example, Together AI has only 71% success rate, while the official API has 100% success rate.
  8. Inference is impressively fast. But what about quality? In the Kimi vendor verifier ( https://github.com/MoonshotAI/K2-Vendor-Verifier/ ), Together has one of the highest tool call failure rates (>300 failures over the benchmark, compared…