Hacker GitHub

← All repos

WebAssembly/design

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 11,635

WebAssembly Design Documents

260 mentions on Hacker News by 196 people: 15 stories, 245 comments · first 2015-06-17 · latest 2026-05-03

Mentions per year 260 mentions · busiest year 2016 (66)
20082026
  1. …flow graphs are well-structured as in high-level languages like Java, JavaScript and Go." See: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/TextFormat... I am delighted :)
    comment by childintime · 2017-06-07 · in Assembling WebAssembly
  2. …currently can't access the DOM directly, but it's definitely a goal to let it do so in the future: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
    comment by comex · 2017-06-07 · in Assembling WebAssembly
  3. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#wil... The text form of Wasm looks like it's going to be far easier to read than minified JS.
  4. …where I stand. Note that I am not the only one thinking this. Core wasm developers agree. [1] [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/219
    comment by sjrd · 2017-06-04 · in Scala.JS 0.6.17 released
  5. …a disadvantage. Those things are on the WASM roadmap. So this isn't just me going off on a tangent. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
  6. On GC, maybe you should let them know. They seem to be headed down that path: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md Oh, and on direct DOM access. You presented a link to an implementation of indirect DOM access. They have…
  7. …a 'better' scripting language without having to pay some overhead costs, one being GC issues. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#is-...
  8. That statement is highly uninformed. I would suggest starting reading from here https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#is-...
    comment by vmasto · 2017-04-03 · in Moving from Node.js to ASP.NET Core
  9. Yep, GC support has been part of WASM's long-term goals since almost the beginning. April 30, 2015: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/commit/16687d30a0859b2...
    comment by Ajedi32 · 2017-03-16 · in Why WebAssembly Is Faster Than Asm.js
  10. …goal It wasn't part of the MVP, but it most definitely is a design goal for future iterations. See: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
    comment by Ajedi32 · 2017-03-16 · in Why WebAssembly Is Faster Than Asm.js
  11. …That's true for now, but they're [planning][1] on adding support for that in the near future. [1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
    comment by Ajedi32 · 2017-03-16 · in Why WebAssembly Is Faster Than Asm.js
  12. …[3] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11263378 [2] https://github.com/stoklund/varint [3] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/601
    comment by Mindless2112 · 2017-03-16 · in Why WebAssembly Is Faster Than Asm.js
  13. …language that you can't compile into wasm is Javascript? This issue was closed 12 hours ago: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/219 I know it's cliche and been written about ad nauseum, but this really does feel like the trojan…
    comment by ballenf · 2017-03-16 · in Why WebAssembly Is Faster Than Asm.js
  14. …VMs for them is much more difficult than a WASM JIT. The WASM FAQ has an entry about LLVM IR: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#why...
    comment by muizelaar · 2017-03-16 · in Why WebAssembly Is Faster Than Asm.js
  15. …have to use JS as a compile target instead of WASM if they want to interact with a web page. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
  16. Support for GC and DOM is coming https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
  17. *Abbreviation ( https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/980 ).
    comment by unwind · 2017-03-01 · in What makes WebAssembly fast?
  18. And they've settled on a logo! https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/980
    comment by theodorton · 2017-03-01 · in A cartoon intro to WebAssembly
  19. I like the new logo (inspired by the side-on profile of an IC) https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/980
  20. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#wil...
  21. Yes: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/119
    comment by mikepurvis · 2017-03-01 · in What makes WebAssembly fast?
  22. It will have a text format (or more than one), but yea probably it will be less readable: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/TextFormat...
    comment by spyder · 2017-03-01 · in What makes WebAssembly fast?
  23. First question in the FAQ https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md Memory allocation is particularly painful in asm.js, for example.
  24. …it as soon as possible and save as much battery as possible on the mobile devices. From the FAQ: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#why... "The kind of binary format being considered for WebAssembly can be natively…
    comment by acqq · 2017-02-28 · in What makes WebAssembly fast?
  25. …roadmap, but not high priority. Edit: No help with a prediction on when, but a bit of the "how": https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
    comment by tyingq · 2017-02-27 · in Emscripten/HTML integration tips
  26. I found the relevant discussion on this: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/960
    comment by n00b101 · 2017-02-10 · in A first look at WebAssembly performance
  27. …of the MVP, but it is listed as a high-level goal[1] and is specced as a future feature[2]. [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/HighLevelG... [2] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
    comment by stupidcar · 2017-02-10 · in JavaScript Start-up Performance
  28. …Further performance improvements are very likely, can see some of the planned improvements here: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FutureFeat... Also, we're unlikely to see 10x improvements over JS. Based on the benchmarks…
    comment by ZenoArrow · 2017-02-09 · in A first look at WebAssembly performance
  29. The reason for not using LLVM bitcode or ASM.js is already covered in detail here https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md I am unsure how JVM or CLR are relevant. WebAssembly is not a virtual machine byte code (and neither…
    comment by n00b101 · 2017-02-09 · in A first look at WebAssembly performance
  30. They actually have that question in their FAQ: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#why...
    comment by Ajedi32 · 2017-02-09 · in A first look at WebAssembly performance
  31. …tech demo of the fact that you're directly generating wasm... well...... It's not yet perfect; see https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#is-... . At this point wasm specifies no way to talk to the DOM but only allows you…
    comment by i336_ · 2017-01-30 · in Things Every Hacker Once Knew
  32. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/TextFormat...
    comment by empath75 · 2017-01-05 · in Compiling Rust to Web Assembly
  33. It is, but not in the first release: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md
    comment by markdog12 · 2016-12-23 · in Announcing Rust 1.14
  34. …comparing wasm to other bytecodes or interpreters. Could you point me to the right place? [1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#why...
    comment by Shoop · 2016-11-29 · in Angry Bots Demo
  35. There is a design doc describing non-Web embedding for WASM: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/NonWeb.md That doesn't mention HTML but focuses on avoiding JS entirely, so presumably there'd be some more direct way to invoke…
  36. Before I left Google, I worked on this briefly and produced this PR: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/pull/708 It summarizes the discussion so far between various stakeholders. I've since moved on to other things, and I don't know…
    comment by dekimir · 2016-11-02 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  37. …native unsigned operations. For information on the semantics of WebAssembly arithmetic, see https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/Semantics.... For other information about WebAssembly start here…
    comment by wahern · 2016-11-02 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  38. …used in much the same way and has some of the same developers working on it. This might help you: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md
    comment by bobajeff · 2016-11-01 · in WebAssembly Stack Machine
  39. …it was an AST but they got pushback from browser backend people and pivoted to a stack machine. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/755 AST was a good idea and parsing as validation was excellent. Having a general stack machine…
    comment by CalChris · 2016-11-01 · in WebAssembly Stack Machine
  40. Doesn't appear to be standardized yet, but some of the goals are outlined here. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/TextFormat...
    comment by SquareWheel · 2016-11-01 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  41. There is a FAQ entry on this point: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#is-...
    comment by binji · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  42. I really think that https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/112#issuecommen... is the winner in this thread.
    comment by slantview · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  43. I am such a softie: I don't even particularly like https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/112#issuecommen... , but I feel sad that the little koala illustration will never be used.
    comment by zeveb · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  44. …access to browser APIs, but the MVP version that is being implemented now, does not yet allow it: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/JS.md WASM code can call external functions defined per module, and the external code can…
    comment by aspirin · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  45. Looks like https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/112#issuecommen... is the winner.
    comment by jbpetersen · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  46. …VM code supported by all major browsers sounds like one. There's a whole Wiki page dedicated to GC: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/GC.md Sounds like they aim to implement only GC primitives to allow emulating a wide…
    comment by vesinisa · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  47. …announcement overshadow what's really important: bikeshedding over the official WebAssembly logo https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/112 :)
    comment by kibwen · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  48. …access browser functionality through the same Web APIs that are accessible to JavaScript; ? https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/HighLevelG...
    comment by detaro · 2016-10-31 · in WebAssembly Browser Preview
  49. …the caveat that it needs to get traction beyond the web to really take off (which is the goal - https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/249#issuecommen... ).
    comment by rch · 2016-10-04 · in Why I hate frameworks (2005)
  50. No DOM access for the MVP. They do plan on eventually supporting it though: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FutureFeat...