Hacker GitHub

← All repos

EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition

View on GitHub ↗ ★ 23,932 Java

FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition is a no-nonsense implementation of FizzBuzz made by serious businessmen for serious business purposes.

237 mentions on Hacker News by 216 people: 26 stories, 211 comments · first 2013-03-18 · latest 2026-10-31

Mentions per year 237 mentions · busiest year 2022 (28)
20082026
  1. The Github issues list is the real gold mine: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by thesephist · 2018-05-11 · in FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition
  2. This reminds me of enterprise fizz buzz. If you haven't seen it, it's great. https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by ericfrederich · 2018-02-12 · in Fizz Buzz in Tensorflow (2016)
  3. Ha https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by megamindbrian2 · 2017-12-31 · in Microservices in Java? Never
  4. Reminds me of FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition® 1. https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by anonfunction · 2017-12-30 · in Show HN: FizzBuzz using neural networks in Rust
  5. VIPER reminds me of the "Enterprise Code" meme. Take a look at the FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition if you're not familiar: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by jobu · 2017-11-09 · in Much ado about iOS app architecture
  6. https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by anonfunction · 2017-10-12 · in A Little Story About the `yes` Unix Command
  7. No discussion of overthinking FizzBuzz is complete without a shoutout to the glorious EnterpriseFizzBuzz: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by framebit · 2017-09-13 · in Overthinking Fizzbuzz with Monoids
  8. I kinda wish the code for the Clojure and Java implementations were posted. In my limited Java experience, I've found that Java itself is fine, but for some reason, professional Java developers stick to these crazy idioms that result in…
    comment by Sohcahtoa82 · 2017-06-19 · in Java may be verbose, but who cares?
  9. Pretty sure none of your implementations will beat the FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition [1]. [1]: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by simon83 · 2017-06-13 · in How is GNU `yes` so fast?
  10. Perhaps you could contribute to this open source project? https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by joshjje · 2017-05-11 · in Don't overuse interfaces
  11. > While in the JS world, even now that browsers are starting to support ES6, everyone just adds more and more steps to the build process, instead of trying to simplify them. To build on your Java comparison -- this is would be akin to…
    comment by treehau5 · 2017-03-27 · in Next.js 2.0
  12. I am going to leave this here... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_least_power If you enjoy overengineered code, check: - Fizzbuzz Enterprise Edition: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... - Fizzbuzz in…
    comment by partycoder · 2017-03-11 · in “Hello, (real) world” in PHP in 2017
  13. On the contrary, I'd say that having unbounded time tells the interviewer a lot about how you go about building things. Do you know how to build something that works and stop at an appropriate level of abstraction, documentation, and…
  14. > They are the ones who have to have 35 levels of abstraction. Have you seen FizzBuzz: Enterprise Edition ? https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by digler999 · 2017-03-02 · in The myth of using Scala as a better Java
  15. The first tumblr link at the bottom in the comments linked me to FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
  16. Obligatory reference to https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by MaxfordAndSons · 2016-11-22 · in Show HN: Java Bullshifier
  17. This is like "Why Don't Mathematicians Learn to Program?" "I had this talk where I wanted to feel superior so I showed an obtuse way to notate a simple situation" "You can see my code I showed a room full of people who have more important…
    comment by gravypod · 2016-11-19 · in Why Don't Computer Scientists Learn Math?
  18. https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
  19. This article itches me on so many levels. It is not wrong directly but it is definitely not the truth either. I expected more from someone who claims to be a scientist. The main issue I have with the piece is the oversimplification of the…
  20. As a counterexample to the theory that incomprehensibility equals superiority, fizzbuzz java https://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/FizzBuzz/Java vs fizzbuzz Enterprise java https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...…
    comment by VLM · 2016-08-23 · in Contempt Culture (2015)
  21. When you write of Microsoft Dynamics GP, this FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition repo comes to mind: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
  22. It's just a jape, not to be taken seriously, made in the great comic tradition of FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by bstrand · 2016-05-23 · in Fizz Buzz in Tensorflow
  23. A few years back I worked on a project (by myself!) where I inherited an epic codebase that was basically the Enterprise Fizzbuzz application scaled up to ~30 person years of effort - it had tens of thousands of classes and a seeming…
  24. Hi, author here. > since it's so trivial that it leaves the "how does a 'real' compiler parse" question unanswered. I'm sure it is tempting to bake everything into this project. After implementing a "real" parser, you might want to…
    comment by thejameskyle · 2016-04-01 · in Super Tiny Compiler
  25. he may have meant this: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... One just can't write this shit in Go. The language itself precludes it.
    comment by shitgoose · 2016-03-29 · in Building Web Apps in Go
  26. And for the Java/Enterprise equivalent: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
  27. Reminds me of Fizzbuzz enterprise edition: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by huskyr · 2016-03-24 · in Left-pad as a service
  28. in Java you always have this.. Impl Impl Impl.. Impl everywhere. I feel it's being passed from a senior and a junior dev who interprets the "program to an interface" idiom. Its so annoying to follow a code that is deeply nested with calls…
    comment by miralabs · 2016-02-13 · in AWS Java documentation is fucked
  29. "I was amazed by the then patterns-obsessed ludicrous verbosity of Java projects. Programming for the sake of writing so much text to accomplish so little." Tell me you've seen this: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterp…
  30. I took a look at the source, and this is some of the cleanest Java I've seen yet. Certainly nothing like https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
  31. The EnterpriseQualityCoding version of FizzBuzz[0] is the ultimate (hilarious) version of this. Though, there is still some room for development of node, js, etc versions. [0] https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by MAGZine · 2015-11-19 · in Oh, Go Ahead, Overthink FizzBuzz (2008)
  32. Both your example and the Java one are not abstract enough (although the added string conversion is nice.) I was expecting more design patterns and layering for a truly enterprise-quality solution, like this:…
  33. I think long names are relative. Jokes like these[1] don't come from a vacuum. I've seen serious code with sentence-long variable names before, and it does make it hard for me to read at a glance. [1] https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCod…
  34. My approach is to break stuff. If I can break it (and I am good at finding bugs, so I usually can) then I now have a narrow focus which helps me getting "lost" in the code base. Once I've found and fixed a few things, or if the code base…
  35. It never hurts to study the masters in serious enterprise software: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by overgard · 2015-06-06 · in Java: Real or Not?
  36. I think every programmer goes through the "smart" stage, where you start to get confident and write "clever" solutions for simple problems. Where you will hopefully transcend to writing simple solutions for hard problems. Personally I hate…
  37. How does the "AI" interpret this repo: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... It's near perfect idiomatic java. But does the dev solve any actual problem? More generally, how can you really evaluate a code project…
  38. Like this? https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
  39. Also see FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by WatchDog · 2015-04-26 · in FizzBuzz in Too Much Detail
  40. It's good, but do you seriously think that's going to get past review? Here's a much better corporate-level version of FizzBuzz: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by mathieuh · 2015-04-26 · in FizzBuzz in Too Much Detail
  41. Or if that fails: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by kibwen · 2015-03-09 · in On Secretly Terrible Engineers
  42. They rejected my pull request to migrate their markdown docs to docbook. https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by syncsynchalt · 2014-12-21 · in FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition
  43. I love that there is a commit to 'remove redundant import'. https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... Being enterprise software, the last thing they need in the codebase is clutter.
    comment by imron · 2014-12-21 · in FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition
  44. TL;DR: Java as a language is not bad. The problem with Java is its bloatware ecosystem. Endemic to the Java world are uninstallability, Rube Goldberg machine code, and such heights of over-engineering that they're easily parodied:…
    comment by api · 2014-12-03 · in Java Doesn’t Suck
  45. Here is a parody of what they're terrified of https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by VLM · 2014-12-03 · in Resumes suck for hiring engineers
  46. Ahh Enterprise. Protip for anyone applying for an enterprise job: just copy-paste https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... when they do the mandatory fizzbuzz test in the job interview. And then complain in the…
  47. I think this code truly represents the essence of this article: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by moretti · 2014-07-22 · in Java Developers
  48. Have you seen https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... ? It's a well-known parody, but one could also say it's "obviously written to a high standard", for some definitions of "standard".
  49. [3] is broken, should be https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
    comment by hanley · 2014-05-01 · in Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2014)
  50. The actual Java implementation: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... A non-programmer’s solution to “Fizz Buzz” https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4853509 FizzBuzz Still Works…
    comment by platz · 2014-04-09 · in Unpythonic Python